Diagnostic Laparoscopy in Infertility - A Retrospective study

Shetty , Shraddha K and Shetty, Harish (2013) Diagnostic Laparoscopy in Infertility - A Retrospective study. International Journal of Biomedical Research, 4 (7). pp. 343-348. ISSN 0976-9633

[img] PDF
Diagnostic Laparoscopy in Infertility - A Retrospective study.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (271kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Background: Infertility affects approximately 10% of the population.One third (30%) of infertility can be attributed to male factors, and about one third (30%) can be attributed to female factors. In about 20% of cases infertility is unexplained, and the remaining 10% of infertility is caused by a combination of problems in both partners. Diagnostic laparoscopy is the gold standard in diagnosing tubal pathology and other intra‐abdominal causes of infertility. Objective: To evaluate the role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of infertility. Study design: Retrospective study. Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, K.S. Hegde Charitable hospital, Mangalore from July 2006 to December 2007. Methods: Fifty infertile women underwent diagnostic laparoscopy during the study period. Couples who had not lived together for at least 12 months, and those with male factor infertility were excluded. Laparoscopy was scheduled in the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle. Results: Of thefifty women studied, 34 (64%) had primary infertility while 16 (36%) secondary infertility. Laparoscopy revealed normal findings in 8 (23.5%) with primary infertility and 2 (12.5%) with secondary infertility. The common finding was tubal blockage in 9 (26.5%) and 4 (25%) of primary and secondary infertility respectively. Polycystic ovaries were detected in 4 (11.7%) of primary infertility and 1 (6.25%) in secondary infertility. Endometriosis was found in 5 (14.7%) with primary infertility and 1 (6.25%) in secondary infertility group. Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) was found in 1 (2.9%) and 3 (18.7%) of primary and secondary infertility respectively. Peritubal and periovarian adhesions were detected in 3 (8.8%) with primary infertility and 3 (18.7%) in secondary infertility. Fibroids were found in 3 (8.8%) and 1 (6.25%) in primary and secondary infertility respectively. Ovarian cyst detected in 1 (2.9%) in primary infertility and 1(6.25%) in secondary infertility. Conclusion: The most common cause responsible for infertility was tubal occlusion in both primary and secondary infertility group. Laparoscopy is necessary in establishing diagnosis of female infertility.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: causes; diagnostic laparoscopy; primary infertility; secondary infertility
Subjects: Medicine > KMC Mangalore > Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Depositing User: KMCMLR User
Date Deposited: 20 Nov 2013 05:28
Last Modified: 20 Nov 2013 05:28
URI: http://eprints.manipal.edu/id/eprint/137762

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item