MU Digital Repository
Logo

Craniofacial displacement in response to varying headgear forces evaluated biomechanically with finite element analysis

Gautam, Pawan and Valiathan, Ashima and Adhikari, Raviraj (2009) Craniofacial displacement in response to varying headgear forces evaluated biomechanically with finite element analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. pp. 507-515. ISSN 0889-5406

[img] PDF
Craniofacial displacement in response to varying headgear forces evaluated biomechanically with finite element analysis.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (236kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate biomechanically the displacement patterns of the facial bones in response to different headgear loading by using a higher-resolution finite element method model than used in previous studies. Methods: An analytical model was developed from sequential computed tomography scan images taken at 2.5-mm intervals of a dry skull of a 7-year-old. Different headgear forces were simulated by applying 1 kg of posteriorly directed force in the first molar region to simulate cervical-pull, straight-pull, and high-pull headgear. Displacements (in mm) of various craniofacial structures were evaluated along the x, y, and z coordinates with different headgear loading. Results: All 3 headgears demonstrated posterior displacement of the maxilla with clockwise rotation of the palatal plane. The distal displacement of the maxilla was the greatest with the straight-pull headgear followed by the cervical-pull headgear. The high-pull headgear had better control in the vertical dimensions. The midpalatal suture opening was evident and was more pronounced in the anterior region. The articular fossa and the articular eminence were displaced laterally and postero-superiorly with each headgear type. Conclusions: The high-pull headgear was most effective in restricting the antero-inferior maxillary growth vector. Midpalatal suture opening similar to rapid maxillary expansion was observed with all 3 headgear types. The center of rotation varied with the direction of headgear forces for both the maxilla and the zygomatic complex. A potential for chondrogenic and osteogenic modeling exists for the articular fossa and the articular eminence with headgear loading. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:507-15)

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Dentistry > MCODS Manipal > Orthodontics
Engineering > MIT Manipal > Mechanical and Manufacturing
Depositing User: MIT Library
Date Deposited: 31 Mar 2016 14:26
Last Modified: 31 Mar 2016 14:26
URI: http://eprints.manipal.edu/id/eprint/145719

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item