Quality of the reviews submitted by attendees of a workshop on peer review

Praharaj, Samir Kumar (2017) Quality of the reviews submitted by attendees of a workshop on peer review. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 39 (6). pp. 785-788. ISSN 0253-7176

[img] PDF
RMS - 00003788.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (2MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to study the methodological quality and error detection of the review by the participants of a peer review workshop. Methods: All participants of the workshop were invited to peer review a randomized controlled trial. The manuscript was E‑mailed to them after introducing eight deliberate errors to it. Specific instructions and a deadline were provided. All the reviews were analyzed using review quality instrument (RQI). Furthermore, the rate and the type of errors identified were recorded. Results: Of 25 participants, 16 (64%) returned the reviews. The mean total score on RQI was 4.12 (standard deviation 0.70, 95% confidence interval 3.74–4.50); the items which most reviewers did not discuss where the importance of research question and originality of the paper. The number of errors correctly identified varied from 0 to 6 (median 3), the most common being a wrong conclusion (87.5%), randomization procedure (50%), written informed consent (50%), ethics committee appro al (42.8%), and masking (31.2%). Only 5 (31.2%) gave an overall recommendation on whether the manuscript should be accepted or not. Conclusions: Major errors were readily identified by the reviewers; however, the need for training was felt in some areas in which the review quality was modest.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Error detection; methodological quality; peer review.
Subjects: Medicine > KMC Manipal > Psychiatry
Depositing User: KMC Library
Date Deposited: 15 Jan 2018 06:20
Last Modified: 15 Jan 2018 06:20
URI: http://eprints.manipal.edu/id/eprint/147799

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item