Multi-omics research trends in sepsis: a bibliometric, comparative analysis between the united states, the european union 28 member states, and China

Evangelatos, Nikolaos and Satyamoorthy, K and Brand, Angela (2018) Multi-omics research trends in sepsis: a bibliometric, comparative analysis between the united states, the european union 28 member states, and China. OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology, 22 (3). pp. 190-197.

[img] PDF
00004289.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (286kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

‘‘-Omics’’ research is in transition with the recent rise of multi-omics technology platforms. Integration of ‘‘-omics’’ and multi-omics research is of high priority in sepsis, a heterogeneous syndrome that is widely recognized as a global health burden and a priority biomedical funding field. We report here an original study on bibliometric trends in the use of ‘‘-omics’’ technologies, and multi-omics approaches in particular, in sepsis research in three (supra)national settings, the United States, the European Union 28 Member States (EU-28), and China. Using a 5-year longitudinal bibliometric study design from 2011 to 2015, we analyzed the sepsisrelated research articles in English language that included at least one or multi-omics technologies in publicly available form in Medline (free full texts). We found that the United States has had the lead (almost one-third of publications) in the inclusion of an ‘‘-omics’’ or multi-omics technology in sepsis within the study period. However, both China and the EU-28 displayed a significant increase in the number of publications that employed one or more types of ‘‘-omics’’ research ( p < 0.005), while the EU-28 displayed a significant increase especially in multi-omics research articles in sepsis ( p < 0.05). Notably, more than half of the multiomics research studies in the sepsis knowledge domain had a university or government/state funding source. Among the multi-omics research publications in sepsis, the combination of genomics and transcriptomics was the most frequent (40.5%), followed by genomics and proteomics (20.4%). We suggest that the lead of the United States in the field of ‘‘-omics’’ and multi-omics research in sepsis is likely at stake, with both the EU-28 and China rapidly increasing their research capacity. Moreover, ‘‘triple omics’’ that combine genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics analyses appear to be uncommon in sepsis, and yet much needed for triangulation of systems science data. These observations have implications for ‘‘-omics’’ technology policy and global research funding strategic foresight.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Sepsis; funding sources; bioeconomy; research policy; multi-omics.
Subjects: Departments at MU > Public Health
Life Sciences > MLSC Manipal
Depositing User: KMC Library
Date Deposited: 22 May 2018 09:44
Last Modified: 22 May 2018 09:44
URI: http://eprints.manipal.edu/id/eprint/151046

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item