Urinary versus recombinant gonadotropins for ovarian stimulation in women undergoing treatment with assisted reproductive technology

Kumar, Pratap (2018) Urinary versus recombinant gonadotropins for ovarian stimulation in women undergoing treatment with assisted reproductive technology. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 11 (2). pp. 119-124. ISSN 0974-1208

[img] PDF
00005052.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (639kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Globally, about 10%–15% couples are affected by infertility, with major role being played by the couple’s lifestyle. Several gonadotropin preparations (urinary, purified urinary, recombinant, and biosimilars) are available for use. Purified urinary formulations offer numerous advantages over their predecessor, including lesser injection dose required, ability to be administered subcutaneously, less batch‑to‑batch variability, better efficacy, ability to individualize protocols as per patient’s need, better control of developing follicles, less risk of multiple pregnancies, and hyperstimulation. Published results of Cochrane reviews and meta‑analysis show no difference in efficacy or safety between urinary and recombinant gonadotropins. In the absence of any significant difference, cost plays an important role in deciding choice of gonadotropins. In this article, we have reviewed the results of comparative clinical trials, Cochrane analysis, and meta‑analysis to derive consensus statements regarding efficacy, safety, and cost implications of urinary versus recombinant gonadotropin preparations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Ovulation; recombinant; urinary gonadotropins.
Subjects: Medicine > KMC Manipal > Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Depositing User: KMC Library
Date Deposited: 17 Sep 2018 04:51
Last Modified: 17 Sep 2018 04:51
URI: http://eprints.manipal.edu/id/eprint/151983

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item