Adherence of randomized controlled trials to consolidated standards of reporting trials 2010 guidelines: A survey of randomized controlled trials published in 2011-2016 in 3 periodontology journals

Siddiq, Hanan and Pentapati, Kalyana Chakravarthy and Acharya, Shashidhar (2019) Adherence of randomized controlled trials to consolidated standards of reporting trials 2010 guidelines: A survey of randomized controlled trials published in 2011-2016 in 3 periodontology journals. The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice, 19 (3). pp. 260-272. ISSN 1532-3382

[img] PDF
RMS - 00007713.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (498kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Objective: To assess the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the Journal of Clinical Periodontology (JCP), Journal of Periodontology (JOP), and Journal of Periodontal Research (JPR), published in the years 2011 until 2016, using Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 guidelines. Methods: A thorough search of PubMed for RCTs published between January 2011 and December 2016 in the three journals was carried out. The CONSORT 2010 checklist (36 questions) was used to evaluate the adherence of these RCTs to these guidelines. A modified CONSORT score was calculated and categorized as “perfect” (100%), “excellent” (80%-99%), “good” (60%-79%), “modest” (40%-59%), and “poor” (,40%). Results: A total of 369 RCTs were published in the three periodontology journals from 2011 until 2016. Based on the modified CONSORT score among all the RCTs, title, abstract, and introduction sections of the included RCTs showed good adherence to the CONSORT 2010 guidelines (60%-79%), whereas the adherence was poor for half the items in methodology (,40%), results (,40%), and discussion (40%). The highest modified CONSORT score was obtained for the trials published in the JCP from 2011 to 2016, whereas the lowest score was achieved by the RCTs in the JPR. Overall, none of the RCTs in any of the journals were perfect in reporting the trials as per the guidelines. Almost half of the RCTs in the JCP showed good adherence (51.1%), whereas almost three-fourths of the RCTs in the JOP (72%) and JPR (82.7%) showed modest to poor adherence as per the reporting guidelines (P ,.001). Conclusion: Among the three periodontology journals assessed, the JCP showed better adherence than the JOP and JPR from 2011 until 2016.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Adherence; Clinical trials; CONSORT; Periodontology; Reporting quality; RCTs.
Subjects: Dentistry > MCODS Manipal > Preventive and Community Dentistry
Depositing User: KMC Library
Date Deposited: 01 Jul 2020 06:27
Last Modified: 01 Jul 2020 06:27
URI: http://eprints.manipal.edu/id/eprint/154954

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item