Advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus and osseous bone graft for socket preservation and ridge augmentation – A randomized control clinical trial

Yewale, Manasi and Bhat, Subraya and Kamath, Abhay and Tamrakar, Aditi and Patil, Vathsala (2021) Advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus and osseous bone graft for socket preservation and ridge augmentation – A randomized control clinical trial. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research, 11. pp. 225-233. ISSN 2212-4268

[img] PDF
00011459.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (2MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical and radiographic effectiveness of A PRF Plus as an adjuctive material to osseous bone graft in socket preservation and ridge augmentation. Methods: Twenty patients with need to preserve extraction socket in non-molar sites planning for further prosthetic rehabilitation were divided into two groups. Test Group (Group A) was treated with A PRF Plus membrane and Sybograf plus ™ (70% HA and 30 %β TCP) bone graft. The Control Group (Group B) was treated with Sybograf plus ™ (70% HA and 30% βTCP) bone graft. Both groups had same socket preservation surgical technique. Results: Both Group A and Group B showed significant improvement in clinical and radiographic parameters. Mean socket length, Vertical Resorption reduction in Group A was 1.48 whereas in Group B was 1.67 which is statistically significant. (p � 0.05). Changes in Horizontal width reduction at 1,3, and 5 mm depth of the socket for both groups were not statistically significant. The Gain in socket fill for Group A and B 6 months postoperatively was 1185.30HU 473.21 and 966.60 HU 273.27 respectively. But intergroup comparison was not statistically significant. (p ¼ 0.17). There were no significant statistical differences in postoperative pain in Group A and Group B as subjects experienced moderate amount of pain. The assessment of post-operative swelling showed that only 30% subjects in Group A reported with swelling. Whereas 80% subjects in Group B complained of post-operative swelling. Conclusion: The results of the present study proved utilisation of A PRF Plus as a promising adjunct to conventional regenerative therapy for socket preservation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Extraction socket ; Socket preservation ; Osseous bone graft ; A PRF Plus ; Implant ; Ridge preservation ; Esthetics.
Subjects: Dentistry > MCODS Manipal > Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Dentistry > MCODS Manipal > Oral Medicine and Radiology
Dentistry > MCODS Manipal > Periodontology
Depositing User: KMC Library
Date Deposited: 02 Nov 2021 07:00
Last Modified: 02 Nov 2021 07:00
URI: http://eprints.manipal.edu/id/eprint/157646

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item