Performance of neurophysiological, neuroimaging, biomechanical and clinical predictors and prediction models of upper extremity motor recovery following stroke - a systematic review protocol

Sardesai, Sanjukta and Durairaj, Subramanian and Guddattu, Vasudeva and Solomon, John M and Gorthi, Sankar Prasad and Kumaran, Senthil D (2020) Performance of neurophysiological, neuroimaging, biomechanical and clinical predictors and prediction models of upper extremity motor recovery following stroke - a systematic review protocol. Physical Therapy Reviews, 25 (2). pp. 1-8. ISSN 1083-3196

[img] PDF
10942 DisplayPdf.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Background: Stroke has been identified as a major cause of disability often due to the upper-extremity impairments, recovery from which, takes place over a period of time.Prediction models or predictors have been formulated for predicting upper-extremity recovery following stroke. However, we still lack knowledge about the hierarchy of available prediction models for recovery prognosis and hence a systematic review for the same is warranted.Objectives: To systematically review and assess the level of evidence underpinning the performance of prediction models or predictors (incorporating neurophysiological, neuroimaging,biomechanical and/or clinical measures) in predicting upper-extremity motor recovery post-stroke.Methods: Six online databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, OvidSP, Proquest and CINAHL) will be searched using database-specific terms. Two reviewers will independently screen relevant studies and extract data from eligible articles using a modified CHecklist for critical Appraisal and data extraction for systematic Reviews of prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS). Risk of bias of included articles will be assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST) and overall level of evidence will be determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE).Discussion: Extant systematic reviews have analogized data from recovery prediction models based on therapist-rated and patient-reported outcome measures. Even so, the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable Task Force have recommended quantifying movement quality using instrument-based outcome measures to determine recovery. Therefore,this protocol elucidates the steps of a systematic review assessing the evidence on prediction models or predictors comprising certain instrument-based outcomes that predict upperextremity recovery post-stroke

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Cerebrovascular accident; Upper limb recovery; Prediction; Kinematic measures; Regression models
Subjects: Allied Health > MCOAHS Manipal > Physiotherapy
Departments at MU > Public Health
Medicine > KMC Manipal > Neurology
Depositing User: KMC Library
Date Deposited: 12 Mar 2021 07:02
Last Modified: 12 Mar 2021 07:02
URI: http://eprints.manipal.edu/id/eprint/156532

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item